• Bijan Robinson · Atlanta Falcons

Look for: On early downs, watch whether Bijan Robinson or Brian Robinson Jr. gets past the first cluster of defenders without having to stop or reverse direction.

If you see it: If the backs repeatedly reach the linebackers with forward momentum, Atlanta can keep using the part of its offense that worked best last week.

Here's what it means: Consistent clean runs would let Atlanta avoid asking its passing game to rescue long-yardage situations.

• Lukas Van Ness · Green Bay Packers

Look for: After the snap, watch the outside of Atlanta's blocking formation and count whether the quarterback has time to set his feet before Van Ness closes in.

If you see it: If Van Ness is forcing hurried throws or making the quarterback move immediately, Green Bay is creating pressure without needing the result to be a sack.

Here's what it means: That kind of disruption raises the difficulty of Atlanta's attempt to play a cleaner, lower-risk passing game.

• Skyy Moore · Green Bay Packers

Look for: On Atlanta punts and kickoffs, note where Moore fields the ball and whether the first coverage wave keeps him moving sideways rather than upfield.

If you see it: If Moore gets through the first wave and turns upfield, Green Bay may begin possessions near midfield instead of deep in its own territory.

Here's what it means: Short fields would reduce how far an offense that gained 199 yards last week must travel to score.

Atlanta Falcons · Running Back (RB)

He carried 16 times for 72 yards last week. Atlanta's clearest path to steadier offense starts with keeping him involved.

Atlanta Falcons · Wide Receiver (WR)

London caught four of five targets for 51 yards, accounting for more receiving yardage than any other listed Atlanta player.

Green Bay Packers · Quarterback (QB)

Love threw for only 145 yards against the Jets, but his two touchdown passes came without an interception.

Green Bay Packers · Wide Receiver (WR)

Watson drew 11 targets and caught a touchdown last week. With Jayden Reed out, his connection with Love becomes even more prominent.

Green Bay Packers · Edge Rusher (EDGE)

Van Ness recorded 10 tackles, 1.5 sacks and four quarterback hits in Week 2, making him the Green Bay defender most likely to become noticeable around Atlanta's quarterbacks.

Green Bay Packers · Wide Receiver (WR)

Moore amassed 92 yards on four punt returns and 116 yards on four kickoff returns last week, production that can shorten the field even when Green Bay's offense is not moving consistently.

The Falcons' five Week 2 turnovers separated their 286 yards of offense from a three-point result. A sharp reduction in giveaways would make their existing rushing production far more useful.

The Packers already showed they could win a close game with limited total offense. Against Atlanta, sustaining more drives would make them less dependent on touchdown efficiency and return-game field position.

With two offensive linemen and Reed ruled out, Green Bay must redistribute blocking and receiving responsibilities. If those adjustments stall the offense, Atlanta's ability to run and shorten the game becomes more relevant.

Atlanta ran for 157 yards and still lost by 31; how much of this matchup is simply about making its useful rushing production matter by protecting the ball?

With Reed unavailable, does Love keep feeding Watson after 11 targets, or does Matthew Golden's 58-yard Week 2 performance lead to a larger role?

Can Moore tilt field position again, or will Atlanta's coverage units prevent the kind of return lanes that produced 208 yards last week?

Green Bay recorded pressure from several defenders in Week 2, but Van Ness led the way with four quarterback hits. How much does Atlanta alter its passing plan to account for him?